A revolution in group employment?

It is now common in corporate groups for supervisors or colleagues to be employed by other group companies. In such a case, the employee may claim that his/her actual employer is not the company with which he/she has a contract, but, for example, the group headquarters. This position was confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union in a ruling issued in October this year. Pursuing claims against the de facto employer raises significant legal risks for the affected group. Defending against potential employee allegations is possible, but it requires prior preparation.

Lawyer Przemysław Mazur comments on this issue for Gazeta Prawna.

Article available: HERE

Can an employment contract be terminated by email?

The current practice of applying the provisions regulating the form of conclusion and termination of employment contracts is inconsistent with the contemporary realities of business transactions. Nowadays, it is fully justified to assume that the notion “in writing” also includes actions of a written nature performed in documentary form, through electronic communication means (especially e-mail).

The issue of the manner of interpreting the notion ‘in writing’ on the basis of the provisions of the Labour Code is analysed by Przemysław Mazur, advocate, in the pages of the latest issue of the Labour Law Monitor.

Collective redundancies

The Collective Redundancies Act gives a significant degree of discretion as to which employees will be made redundant. However, this freedom does not mean arbitrariness. In a collective redundancy procedure, the employer should specify the criteria for selecting employees for redundancy. These criteria should be objective and fair,” writes legal advisor Przemysław Mazur in an article for prawo.pl.

Link to the article: here

Violation of a shareholder’s personal rights. How is the company manager liable?

Prof. Michał Romanowski comments for Gazeta Prawna on a high-profile corporate dispute concerning a listed company in an article by editor Marzena Sosnowska titled. ‘Violation of a shareholder’s personal rights. How is the company’s manager liable‘.

The essence of the legal problem boils down to the question of whether a manager of a public company can be held liable for the infringement of a shareholder’s personal rights mentioned in the company’s report.

Prof. Michał Romanowski:
“ESPI is used for the communication by the issuer’s management of information from the life of the issuer relevant to investors. Communicating information about a serious conflict whose venue is the general meeting of shareholders, and in particular when the general meeting […] becomes a kind of arena of struggle for control over the company, if the information is communicated in a reliable manner, is not only the right but also the duty of the management board. If there was even a fight at the general meeting, “competing” general meetings were held in parallel, security companies were hired, this is information that […] should be disclosed in the ESPI. This is because they have an impact on the decision to invest in the shares of such a company. […] I would not mix brutalised legal tactics aimed at achieving an effect regardless of the methods with the civil and constitutional concept of respect for human dignity. Unfortunately, on the Polish market of public companies we are still too often dealing with legal tactics straight from the ‘culture of Eastern law’, where mindless force has primacy over rational argument.”